Tuesday, June 30, 2009

My Week With Acton

by: R.J. Moeller


“No man ought to write at all, or even to speak at all, unless he thinks that he is in truth and the other man in error.” -G.K. Chesterton (Heretics)

I realize that the challenge here from Mr. Chesterton may sound unnecessarily confrontational to the fragile sensibilities of the modern American reader. But I believe it is precisely because we’ve lost our stomachs for defending truth that we are losing our country (and minds).

For a moment, drown out the empty, hollow calls for “unity”, “open-mindedness” and “bi-partisanship” that dominate the rhetoric of our politics, media, and academic institutions. These calls for harmonization, regardless of what party or ideology is making the plea, invariably amount to nothing more than an appeal for all others to join their “side”. Unity, as it is so carelessly defined by the secular world today, equates to unquestioned conformity.

The reality of life is that we all believe in something. For better or worse, we all have worldviews and philosophies of life that are used as navigation systems through life’s murky waters. Whether it is in regards to what baseball team we will root for or in deciding whom to cast our precious ballot for come every other November, each of us make decisions, take positions, and accrue perspectives that enable us to function as normal human beings.

In every facet and area of life, from economic policy to gourmet cooking, there are “better ways” of doing things, and the divulgence and defense of the better ways we discover is a moral imperative for members of a free society. Freedom isn’t free, and one of the prices we are privileged to pay in America is the personal and collective engagement with the world around us. This presumes you have lived enough to learn, and that you care enough to contribute your experience, knowledge, and values to the melting pot that is the Unites States.

The Acton Institute, a visionary organization and energetic think-tank located in Grand Rapids, MI named after British historian and political philosopher Lord Acton, is exactly the type of place where G.K. Chesterton’s mandate is accepted and cultivated.

Even in the face of rampant moral relativism and cultural apathy towards “that politics stuff”, not all have given up hope for a freer and more virtuous society. Not everyone is disinterested in preserving the ideas and values Abraham Lincoln rightly labeled, “the last, best hope of earth” nearly 150 years ago. There are still those who believe that debate and disagreement is not to be avoided, and that the citizen who does not genuinely believe in (or understand) the things they say, do, or vote for is exactly the type of citizen who unravels civilizations from within.

Founded in 1990 by Father Robert Sirico, the Acton Institute offers an intellectual harbor in the secular-progressive tempest where truth-seeking, freedom-loving people can shed the myth of moral relativism, embrace the challenges of informed discourse, and seriously debate the issues affecting our world today.

Acton does this with the acknowledged intention of actually discovering and advancing those “better ways” I mentioned. In short, they think they are right about something like free enterprise being a good thing worth preserving, and, for example, that Nancy Pelosi’s vision of a top-down bureaucratically controlled economy is wrong.

Acton’s stated purpose is the “Integrating Judeo-Christian truths with Free Market principles”, and they are refreshingly unapologetic about their mission. Bringing together students, professors, and professionals of faith, Acton is purposefully religious at its core and decidedly ecumenical in its approach to the topics and issues it involves itself with.

Two weeks ago I had the distinct privilege of attending their annual “Acton University” four-day conference held on the campus of Grand Valley State University. More than 300 private citizens, primarily college and graduate students, came from all across the country (and some from as far as Italy and Venezuela) to attend lectures, ask questions of experts in everything from economics to theology, and explore the intellectual foundations of liberty and free markets.

As anyone from Acton will tell you, their goal is not to robotically program minds, but challenge them from the perspective of certain, defined values, principles and facts.

In all honesty, I would need 10 blogs to articulate all that Acton does, and has done to inspire me personally. They offer conferences like the one in Grand Rapids I attended. They have a fantastic website and blog that serves as a useful reference point for those interested in hearing a defense of conservative ideas from actual conservatives for a change. The various films they have produced are stirring, covering topics such as "The Birth of Freedom" and “The Call of the Entrepreneur.” They publish journals, host public debates for their scholars, and sponsor charities and faith-based initiatives.



Because of my admitted inability to thoroughly pay homage to all the things Acton does, I want to focus like a laser beam on what I believe to be the most important service they provide: an articulation and defense of traditional, Judeo-Christian, conservative values and principles in the economic, political, and cultural realm.
At the heart of everything Acton does there is a convergence of faith, reason, ideas, facts, and the practicality any ideology, belief system, or solution must display for it to even be considered as a legitimate option.

The people associated with Acton are not monolithic in their thinking on each and every issue. Theologically, there are predominantly Protestants and Catholics represented. Politically, while there is no affiliation with any political party, I think it fair (and necessary for disclosure’s sake) to say that the socio-political ties that bind Acton employees, speakers and event attendees together are unmistakably and unashamedly Center-Right. You can’t take a stand on issues as a group if there are not some basic, commonly held values and beliefs

I suppose it is a sad commentary about the lack of real and meaningful education regarding topics like liberty and economic freedom that takes place in our nation that a group like the Acton Institute appropriately feels so rare. Or, that each time I sat in a lecture hall during “Acton U”, and a professor or lecturer made a compelling, fact-based point about why something like Keynesian economics has been such a monumental and perpetual failure, I winced in anticipation for outcries of “bigotry” and “intolerance,” that thankfully never came.

Instead, people who might not all agree on the answer, but at least agree on the existence of an answer, discussed topics as diverse as social justice, universal health care, and the causes of the Great Depression in a civil and thoughtful manner.

Almost as if they were truly interested in solving problems, and not just inconsiderately throwing their votes, dollars, and support behind fads or catchy slogans.

Almost as if they realized that ideas have consequences; real, practical, often unintended consequences and thusly decisions we and our leaders make cannot be based purely on feelings and YouTube music videos from Will I Am and Scarlett Johansson.

For “real change” to come to America, we each must begin to shed the cumbersome shackles of moral relativism and intellectual indifference towards the world around us. Truth is real, and it matters. The way we live, the things we do, the politicians we vote for, it all matters. There must be debate, rigorous, vigorous debate over the direction our nation is heading, and no longer can we allow the weak-willed and easily-offended among us to dictate the terms by which we discuss the alternatives in front of us. We all need thicker skins and softer hearts when we enter the combative arena of public discourse.

The people at and involved with Acton understand this. They have rightly seen through the disingenuous calls for the re-defined “unity” and “tolerance” that currently are the clichés-de-jour among the liberal Democrat-dominated power structure in Washington, in the media, and on college campuses from Berkley to Boston.

As if Joe Biden, Keith Olbermann, or Professor Howard Zinn have any interest in conceding their positions in favor of traditional, conservative, or libertarian ones.

Such a self-indulgent insistence upon unity is wrongly presuming that Americans are not capable of both holding deep-rooted ideological, theological, and political differences with their fellow man, and then being kind neighbors and trustworthy business partners at the same time. I think they called this “projection” in the Psych department when I was in college.

No one is a true relativist, and subsequently, everyone believes in something, in certain things. Let’s agree that to disagree is an agreeable privilege for free people. Let’s concede that we all have opinions about the issues we’re faced with in our personal-daily and collective-national lives, and that those opinions matter to us.

And if they matter to us, if we as fallen creatures can find “better ways” of surviving and thriving as individuals and as a nation, let’s get busy sharing them with others. Not in the hopes of making some pie-in-the-sky utopia here on earth, but with a focused, obtainable goal of making a freer, safer, more prosperous, more virtuous republic.

It’s reassuring to know a place like the Acton Institute already is.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Heritage Foundation on Cap-and-Trade Legislation

Friday saw the US House of Representatives passing the largest tax increase in American history with the 219-212 victory of the cap-and-trade bill. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE watch the Heritage Foundation's YouTube video explaining what is actually going on in this piece of (crap) legislation.

Mark Sanford...creepy and weird

So the governor of South Carolina ran off to Argentina last week, to cry in the arms of his South American mistress, and returned Wednesday to give one of the more bizarre press conferences of all time. The story is as tragic (for his family) as it is utterly strange.




Mark Steyn's latest effort at National Review is one of the funnier articles I've read in a while, and in it he explains why it is so many weirdos seem to get elected in this country these days.

An excerpt:
Of course, being nominally a republic of citizen-legislators, we have inaugurated the post-modern pseudo-breakout from “the bubble,” in which the president and his family sally forth to an ice-cream parlor in Alexandria, Va., accompanied only by 200 of their most adoring sycophants from the press corps. These trips, explained the New York Times, enable the Obamas to “stay connected” with ordinary people, like White House reporters.

The real bubble is a consequence of big government. The more the citizenry expect from the state, the more our political class will depend on ever more swollen Gulf Emir–sized retinues of staffers hovering at the elbow to steer you from one corner of the fishbowl to another 24/7. “Why are politicians so weird?” a reader asked me after the Sanford press conference. But the majority of people willing to live like this will, almost by definition, be deeply weird. So big government more or less guarantees rule by creeps and misfits. It’s just a question of how well they disguise it.

Writing about Michael Jackson a few years ago, I suggested that today’s A-list celebs were the equivalent of Mad King Ludwig of Bavaria or the loopier Ottoman sultans, the ones it wasn’t safe to leave alone with sharp implements. But, as Christopher Hitchens says, politics is showbusiness for ugly people. And a celebrified political culture will inevitably throw up its share of tatty karaoke versions of Britney and Jacko.

A Bad Thing

I realize that no one wants to be on the opposite side of anything "green" sounding these days, but the climate-change bill passed last night by the House is an utter disgrace. The legislation has little to do with global warming, cooling or anything in between. What will happen, if this passes in the Senate and is signed in to law by The One, is that our federal government will have effectively put political power ahead of economic prosperity, common sense, and the Constitution.



The sad thing is that even though more than 30 Democrats voted against this monstrosity, 7 RINO's (Republicans In Name Only) jumped ship and endorsed what will become the biggest tax increase in American history. My own Republican congressman, Rep. Mark Kirk of Illinois, was among those. Their 7 votes were the difference in a 219-212 "victory" for the Dem's.

Here's the most important thing for you to know: the Democrats are pushing this stuff through under the guise of economic reform and stimulus, saying that new jobs will be created...it is categorically false, and actually, impossible. This is absolutely and entirely about paying for liberal social programs. Not only is it a tax on families and the price of their heating/cooling bills, it annexes to the federal government more control over who gets to use the carbon credits Al Gore has convinced us matter in the least. Think: indulgences the Church used to make people pay to absolve them of their sins.

On the plus side, maybe Dan Brown will write a cool conspiracy thriller about the evils of centralized power in the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

PLEASE read this summary of what went down last night from the Wall Street Journal.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Inverse Relationship

The more a country relies on its government, the worse off it becomes. Economically. Culturally. And yes, even spiritually.

The numbers don't lie, according to a recent Wall Street Journal column. Christian commentator and author Chuck Colson gives additional insight to the WSJ piece here.


An excerpt from Colson:

In his classic book, Democracy in America, Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville marveled at how Americans could accomplish almost anything through voluntary associations—especially churches. They built schools, hospitals, sent missionaries all over the world. He wrote, “I frequently admired the boundless skill of Americans in setting large numbers of people a common goal and inducing them to strive toward that goal voluntarily.”

De Tocqueville doubted that government could ever accomplish all that American citizens could do through their associations. But he also warned that if government should supplant the good work of these associations, the American people would ultimately end up dependent upon government. And this, he said, would imperil not only American democracy, but “civilization itself.”

In times of trouble, it’s natural to echo the question of the Psalmist: Whence cometh my help?

Sadly, it seems that more and more Americans these days would answer, “It cometh from Uncle Sam.”

Monday, June 22, 2009

Day after Father's Day Thoughts


Dr. Albert Mohler offers some perspective on the distorted version of fatherhood our culture and the academic elites attempt to create. As is the case with most "contentious" issues today that our media try to misrepresent to favor their progressively-informed opinions, the traditional understanding of a father's role in the lives of the people in his family is still widely held and honored among Americans.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Happy Father's Day

For those of us blessed with amazing fathers, today is not just another "Hallmark Holiday": it should be a special time to celebrate the most important men in our lives.

Thanks for all you do, fathers.

And a special thanks to my dad, Dr. Robert Moeller, for teaching your kids to love God, and for always putting the needs of your family ahead of your own.

Happy Father's Day!

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Conservative in Grand Rapids

Hey folks, I'm sorry for no posts this week, but I am attending The Acton Institute's "Acton University" in Grand Rapids, MI and won't be blogging until Sunday.

Some of the best Christian thinkers in the country have congregated here in Michigan to discuss the intersection of Religion and Liberty. More to follow with a report back from yours truly next week.

Monday, June 15, 2009

Told You So

I wrote a piece a while back entitled "Is it really that close?" in which I made the statistical argument that, in fact, America remains a Center-Right nation. This past weekend a Gallup Poll re-confirmed this.

Despite the recent ascension of The One, this country holds at its core conservative values. Republicans, the party conservatives favor (for now), would do well to remember this come the mid-term elections in 2010.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Stay Classy, Letterman


I've been a big fan of David Letterman for as long as I can remember. But during the 2008 election season he took a decidedly political turn, and went from funny to whenever it pertained to Republicans. I obviously have strong feelings when it comes to politics, but I've always appreciated Letterman and Leno and Conan and the rest of the late night comedians for being places of comedy, not ideologically-driven, personal, attacks.

This time Letterman has gone too far, with his disgusting remarks about Sarah Palin's daughters. Check it out for here yourself.

Obama = Carter


Columnist Ann Coulter's latest piece is a gem. She comments on Obama's Cairo speech and the false idea that the war on terror is somehow a "war of choice."

An excerpt:
Obama bravely told the Cairo audience that 9/11 was a very nasty thing for Muslims to do to us, but on the other hand, they are victims of colonization. Except we didn't colonize them. The French and the British did. So why are Arabs flying planes into our buildings and not the Arc de Triomphe? (And gosh, haven't the Arabs done a lot with the Middle East since the French and the British left!)

In another sharks-to-kittens comparison, Obama said, "Now let me be clear, issues of women's equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam." No, he said, "the struggle for women's equality continues in many aspects of American life."

So on one hand, 12-year-old girls are stoned to death for the crime of being raped in Muslim countries. But on the other hand, we still don't have enough female firefighters here in America.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

A Whole Lotta Nothin' Going On


Dr. Thomas Sowell of Stanford's famed Hoover Institute consistently pens the wisest columns around. Today's is no different. In it he explains why doing nothing is not always the best, and not always the worst, idea.

An excerpt:

People who say that we should learn from other countries seem to have in mind that we should imitate those countries. But some of the most valuable lessons from other countries can be had from seeing the disasters their policies have produced-- especially when our own intelligentsia are pushing ideas that have already been tried and failed elsewhere.

We need to pay attention to these sneak previews of coming attractions, even if they consist of doing nothing. Whether in the United States or in other countries, the purpose of all this nothing is of course to pacify public opinion by pretending to be doing something.

Monday, June 08, 2009

America fakes Left, World swerves Right


The "change" many in Europe can believe in is the kind that will lead them away from the failed socialist democracies they've been living in for the past 50-60 years. In elections this past week many countries solidified or further strengthened their conservative leadership structures.

But dont' sweat it, we have things figured out over here with the most liberal administration in U.S. history. Wonder why the mainstream media that votes 80-20 liberal to conservative has largely ignored the slew of recent conservative victories on the continent we're supposed to want to be more like? Isn't the definition of insanity "doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results"?

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Summer Reading from a Wise Soul


Dr. Albert Mohler is the president of Southern Theological Seminary, a syndicated radio talk show host, a syndicated columnist, and for my money the clearest thinker among evangelicals when it comes to political-cultural issues. The guy reads multiple books every week and his base of knowledge and wisdom is broad and dense. For the summer months, Dr. Mohler has comprised a list of the books he recommends for all Americans to read, religious or otherwise.

Check out the ten books and a brief description of each right here on his fantastic blog.

Friday, June 05, 2009

A spot of political gossip


I typically abhor celebrity gossip, considering it the most menial usage of the English language, but when it involves politicians and presidents, I can't resist. The Times of London is reporting that Barack and Michelle have turned down French President Nicholas Sarkozy's dinner invite this weekend, even though the Obama's are staying a block away while in Paris.

Oh, snap! Read more here.

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Are you "green with guilt"?


Washington Post syndicated columnist George Will discusses "ecology as psychology" in his latest piece about the intensity of the "going green" movement sweeping our culture.

An excerpt:
In "The Green Bubble: Why Environmentalism Keeps Imploding" (The New Republic, May 20), Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, authors of "Break Through: Why We Can't Leave Saving the Planet to Environmentalists," say that a few years ago, being green "moved beyond politics." Gestures -- bringing reusable grocery bags to the store, purchasing a $4 heirloom tomato, inflating tires, weatherizing windows -- "gained fresh urgency" and "were suddenly infused with grand significance."

Green consumption became "positional consumption" that identified the consumer as a member of a moral and intellectual elite. A 2007 survey found that 57 percent of Prius purchasers said they bought their car because "it makes a statement about me." Honda, alert to the bull market in status effects, reshaped its 2009 Insight hybrid to look like a Prius.

Nordhaus and Shellenberger note the telling "insignificance," as environmental measures, of planting gardens or using fluorescent bulbs. Their significance is therapeutic, but not for the planet. They make people feel better:

"After all, we can't escape the fact that we depend on an infrastructure -- roads, buildings, sewage systems, power plants, electrical grids, etc. -- that requires huge quantities of fossil fuels. But the ecological irrelevance of these practices was beside the point."

The point of "utopian environmentalism" was to reduce guilt. During the green bubble, many Americans became "captivated by the twin thoughts that human civilization could soon come crashing down -- and that we are on the cusp of a sudden leap forward in consciousness, one that will allow us to heal ourselves, our society, and our planet. Apocalyptic fears meld seamlessly into utopian hopes." Suddenly, commonplace acts -- e.g., buying light bulbs -- infused pedestrian lives with cosmic importance. But:

"Greens often note that the changing global climate will have the greatest impact on the world's poor; they neglect to mention that the poor also have the most to gain from development fueled by cheap fossil fuels like coal. For the poor, the climate is already dangerous."

Now, say Nordhaus and Shellenberger, "the green bubble" has burst, ed by Americans' intensified reluctance to pursue greenness at a cost to economic growth. The dark side of utopianism is "escapism and a disengagement from reality that marks all bubbles, green or financial." Re-engagement with reality is among the recession's benefits.

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Men vs. Wild

The best show on TV (not named LOST or Mad Men) is hands-down Man vs. Wild with the legendary Bear Grylls. This week Bear battled the elements in the Arctic regions of Sweden...oh, and Will Ferrell came with him. If you missed it last night, and you're a sucker if you did, check out the preview clip here and find a time it's replaying on Discovery.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Tragedy in Kansas


This past Sunday a deranged lunatic shot and killed Dr. George Tiller, infamously known as "Tiller the Killer" for his willingness to perform late-term abortions that few other doctors would. It was a murder, done in cold-blood, by an un-named man who thought he was meting our "justice" for the lives of innocent babies that Dr. Tiller has taken through the years.

I am pro-life, conservative, and God-fearing...and what this man did in shooting Dr. Tiller was unconscionable, evil, and wrong. Please note that every leading pro-life group, every prominent evangelical Christian, every visible conservative has rightly and roundly denounced what this murderer did. That is important to remember, because you will be hearing more and more from rabid pro-choicers that this is some sort of common practice, that it is "Christian terrorism", like they tried to label the Oklahoma City bombings more than a decade ago.

Christians, conservatives, and the pro-life movement DO NOT celebrate the loss of another life, even if it is the life of a man who needlessly took so many others' away.

PLEASE read Dr. Albert Mohler's thoughtful piece on this tragic tale from Kansas.

An excerpt:

Proponents of abortion rights often charge that the rhetoric of the pro-life movement leads to violence. After all, we describe abortion as murder and point to the business of abortion as the murder of the unborn. We make clear that abortion is the taking of innocent human life and that what goes on in abortion clinics is the business of death.

We make these arguments because we know they are true. Abortion is murder. What goes on in those clinics is institutionalized homicide, often for financial profit. Abortion is a moral scandal and a national tragedy and a blight upon the American conscience.

But violence in the name of protesting abortion is immoral, unjustified, and horribly harmful to the pro-life cause. Now, the premeditated murder of Dr. George Tiller in the foyer of his church is the headline scandal -- not the abortions he performed and the cause he represented.

We have no right to take the law into our own hands in an act of criminal violence. We are not given the right to take this power into our own hands, for God has granted this power to governing authorities. The horror of abortion cannot be rightly confronted, much less corrected, by means of violence and acts outside the law and lawful means of remedy. This is not merely a legal technicality -- it is a vital test of the morality of the pro-life movement.